tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22604857.post6417955047697970615..comments2021-11-25T07:12:44.557-08:00Comments on Peter Richardson: National Review on Barbara LeePeter Richardsonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16042079618030247691noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22604857.post-62291292240205524182009-04-19T13:43:00.000-07:002009-04-19T13:43:00.000-07:00Good one, Got Milk? You pass the test.Good one, Got Milk? You pass the test.Peter Richardsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16042079618030247691noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22604857.post-70598805327110354392009-04-19T10:19:00.000-07:002009-04-19T10:19:00.000-07:00That's nomilk, not "nonmilk."
Common usage does n...That's nomilk, not "nonmilk."<br /><br />Common usage does not make something correct. Just common.Got Milk?noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22604857.post-30110557107823983482009-04-18T20:40:00.000-07:002009-04-18T20:40:00.000-07:00Noted and corrected, nonmilk, though I think you'l...Noted and corrected, nonmilk, though I think you'll find the definite article in thousands of references, both online and in print. Try Googling "FrontPage" (David Horowitz's publication) and "the National Review" and let me know what you come up with. I got 10,700 hits. <br /><br />Have you corrected Hemingway's more obvious error? I searched in vain for NRO's comment feature.Peter Richardsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16042079618030247691noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22604857.post-57761151231779328802009-04-18T18:22:00.000-07:002009-04-18T18:22:00.000-07:00Oh, by the way it's "National Review" not "the Nat...Oh, by the way it's "<I>National Review</I>" not "<B>the</B> <I>National Review</I>." What you wrote is like saying: "the <I>Time</I> magazine and its founder, Henry Luce."<br /><br />I don't think I can credit anyone, left or right, whose control of the facts is that loose.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com